Compare the2026 Nissan RogueVS 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander

Both the Rogue and the Outlander have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, front seat center airbag, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive and around view monitors.

The Rogue’s corrosion warranty is unlimited miles longer than the Outlander’s (unlimited vs. 100,000 miles).

There are over 3 times as many Nissan dealers as there are Mitsubishi dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Rogue’s warranty.

To reliably power the ignition and other systems and to recharge the battery, the Rogue has a standard 150-amp alternator. The Outlander’s 120-amp alternator isn’t as powerful.

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Rogue third among compact suvs in their 2025 Initial Quality Study. The Outlander isn’t in the top three.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2025 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Nissan vehicles are better in initial quality than Mitsubishi vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Nissan second in initial quality, above the industry average. With 53 more problems per 100 vehicles, Mitsubishi is ranked 25th, below the industry average.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2025 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Nissan vehicles are more reliable than Mitsubishi With 41 fewer problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, J.D. Power ranks Nissan higher than Mitsubishi.

The Rogue’s 1.5 turbo 3-cylinder produces 20 more horsepower (201 vs. 181) and 44 lbs.-ft. more torque (225 vs. 181) than the Outlander’s 2.5 DOHC 4-cylinder.

As tested in Consumer Reports the Nissan Rogue is faster than the Mitsubishi Outlander:

On the EPA test cycle the Rogue gets better mileage than the Outlander:

In heavy traffic or at stoplights the Rogue’s engine automatically turns off when the vehicle is stopped, saving fuel and reducing pollution. The engine is automatically restarted when the driver gets ready to move again. If the conditions warrant or the driver wishes, the system can be manually disabled at any time for the duration of a trip. The Outlander doesn’t offer an automatic engine start/stop system.

The Rogue stops shorter than the Outlander:

The Rogue has a standard space-saver spare tire so you can replace a flat tire and drive to have the flat repaired or replaced. A spare tire isn’t available on the Outlander; it requires you to depend on roadside assistance and your vehicle will have to be towed.

The Rogue has vehicle speed sensitive variable-assist power steering, for low-effort parking, better control at highway speeds and during hard cornering, and a better feel of the road. The Outlander doesn’t offer variable-assist power steering.

For better maneuverability, the Rogue’s turning circle is .7 feet tighter than the Outlander’s (35.4 feet vs. 36.1 feet).

The Nissan Rogue may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 150 to 200 pounds less than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

The Rogue has .5 inches more front headroom, .1 inches more front hip room, .1 inches more rear headroom and .1 inches more rear hip room than the Outlander.

The Rogue has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the Outlander with its rear seat up (36.5 vs. 10.9 cubic feet). The Rogue has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the Outlander with its rear seat folded (74.1 vs. 64.3 cubic feet).

The power windows standard on both the Rogue and the Outlander have locks to prevent small children from operating them. When the lock on the Rogue is engaged the driver can still operate all of the windows, for instance to close one opened by a child. The Outlander prevents the driver from operating the other windows just as it does the other passengers.

On a hot day the Rogue’s driver can lower the front windows from a distance using the keyless remote. The driver of the Outlander can only operate the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

The Rogue’s power window, power lock, power mirror and cruise control switches are lit from behind, making them plainly visible and easier to operate at night. The Outlander’s power window, power lock and power mirror switches are unlit, making them difficult to find at night and operate safely.

Consumer Reports rated the Rogue’s headlight performance “Very Good,” a higher rating than the Outlander’s headlights, which were rated “Good.”

According to iSeeCars.com the 2025 Nissan Rogue retains 51.38% of its original value after 5 years, more than the 48.85% resale value of the 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander after five years, which can save the Nissan’s owner up to $1262.78815 in depreciation.

Consumer Reports® recommends both the Nissan Rogue and the Mitsubishi Outlander, based on reliability, safety and performance.

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Rogue first among compact suvs in owner reported satisfaction. This includes how well the vehicle performs and satisfies its owner’s expectations. The Outlander was rated third.

The Nissan Rogue outsold the Mitsubishi Outlander by almost five to one during 2024.